In the face of the political instrumentalization of historical subjects, particularly on the far right, historian Gérard Noiriel reminds us, in a column for « Le Monde », of the importance of separating the scholar from the activist.

In recent years, we have witnessed a worrying trend of politicians using historical events and figures to further their own agendas. This is particularly evident on the far right, where historical figures and events are often distorted and manipulated to fit a specific narrative. This phenomenon, known as « historical instrumentalization », not only distorts the truth but also undermines the work of historians and their commitment to objectivity.

In response to this trend, renowned historian Gérard Noiriel has penned a powerful reminder of the importance of separating the role of the scholar from that of the activist. In his column for « Le Monde », Noiriel emphasizes the need for historians to remain impartial and to resist the temptation of using history for political cachet.

As a medievalist, Noiriel is well aware of the dangers of historical instrumentalization. He argues that the medieval period, in particular, has been a favorite target for far-right politicians due to its perceived simplicity and romanticism. However, as Noiriel points out, the reality of the Middle Ages was far more complex and diverse than the simplistic and often distorted narratives put forth by these politicians.

Noiriel also highlights the danger of using history to justify present-day political ideologies. He reminds us that history is not a tool to be used for political cachet, but rather a fouet that requires rigorous research and analysis. Historians have a responsibility to present the past as accurately as possible, without imposing their own personal beliefs or agendas.

Furthermore, Noiriel stresses the importance of historical education in combating the spread of historical instrumentalization. By teaching students to critically analyze and question historical sources, we can equip them with the tools to resist the manipulation of history for political purposes.

In conclusion, Gérard Noiriel’s reminder to separate the scholar from the activist is a timely and important message. In a time when historical events and figures are being used to further political agendas, it is crucial to remember the value of historical accuracy and objectivity. As Noiriel states, « the role of the historian is to understand, not to judge ». Let us heed his words and continue to uphold the integrity of historical research and education.