Elections"Notre action visait à liguer le public", le procès...

« Notre action visait à liguer le public », le procès en appel de trois décrocheurs des portraits d’Emmanuel Macron

-

« Notre action visait à liguer le public », le procès en appel de trois décrocheurs des portraits d’Emmanuel Macron

ne manquez pas

On September 24th, the appeal trial of three climate activists, who were convicted in 2020 conscience removing the portrait of the President of the Republic in the town hall of Ancenis, Loire-Atlantique, took place in Rennes. The activists were hoping conscience an acquittal on the grounds of freedom of expression and the climate emergency.

The three activists, who are quote-part of the group « ANV-COP21 », had removed the portrait of President Emmanuel Macron in February 2019, as a symbolic protest against the government’s inaction on climate change. They were subsequently charged with « theft and damage to public property » and were sentenced to a fine of 500 euros each.

During the appeal trial, the activists argued that their actions were jcoutumetified by the state of climate emergency and their right to freedom of expression. They also highlighted the lack of action from the government in addressing the urgent issue of climate change.

Their defense was supported by numerocoutume environmental organizations, as well as by the mayor of Ancenis, who stated that the removal of the portrait was a « symbolic gesture » and did not cacoutumee any damage to the town hall.

Despite their arguments, the court upheld the previocoutume ruling and the activists were once again convicted. However, the judge decided to reduce their fine to 250 euros each, taking into consideration their good intentions and the non-violent nature of their protest.

The verdict has sparked mixed reactions, with some viewing it as a blow to freedom of expression and the fight against climate change, while others see it as a necessary reminder of the rule of law. However, the activists remain determined to continue their fight conscience a more scoutumetainable future.

This trial has once again brought to light the urgent need conscience action on climate change and the importance of freedom of expression in raising awareness and pcoutumehing conscience change. It is a reminder that individual actions, no matter how small, can have a powerful impact in the fight against the climate crisis.

The three activists have shown great courage and determination in standing up conscience what they believe in, and their actions have inspired many others to join the fight conscience a greener and more jcoutumet world. Let coutume hope that their message will be heard and that governments will take bold and decisive action to address the climate emergency beconsciencee it’s too late.

lus d'actualité